I attended the planning commission meeting. I listened to them tell the public that our comments didn't matter. I have read comments in the news and on Facebook asking "why are you against the mountain coaster?" and "why is everyone whining about it?" Here is my answer:
Why am I against it? For a lot of reasons:
1) It will bring more traffic up an already congested canyon. This will bring more trash, air pollution, noise pollution.
2) It will be an eyesore on one of our most accessible State Scenic Byways.
3) When I recreate up in that canyon I want wildness, such development, including existing structures, negatively impact my experience.
4) The Wasatch Master Plan is currently being revised. I think we should wait till that is complete before we approve any further major development such as this. This will help deal with issues of traffic, watershed, approved uses, etc.
5) It doesn’t fit within the current master plan from 1989 and thus doesn’t meet criteria for a conditional use permit--though the county thinks otherwise.
6) It is being approved without any actual plans, no architectural drawings, only artist renderings. We don’t even know what we are getting.
7) As noted above, with increased traffic, construction, people, pollution, I worry about our watershed. And with Snowbird using some cocktail of ammonia/vinegar and “other chemicals” to spray the structure and other structures with, I am leery to let them build anything that requires it.
8) Development is always a slippery slope. Here are a list of other existing threats to our Wasatch:
a) Snowbirds efforts to expand into American Fork
b) Snowbirds efforts to build a mall on top of Hidden Peak which will be visible from anywhere in the valley and the mountains.
c) The Basshole (existing)
d) Alta’s efforts to expand across Flagstaff Peak and the Emma Ridge.
e) Alta and Snowbird’s efforts (in process) of building more condos and shopping in the canyon.
f) Solitudes efforts to expand into Silver Fork.
g) Developers efforts to build multiple (6 I think) golf courses and condo projects over Guardsman's Pass--all they need is the road to get paved.
h) The threat of the Alta-Brighton tunnel.
9) Also, Snowbird didn’t present any other option. I assume that rather than dealing with the USFS land (which would keep the roller coaster on the north slope and less intrusive--more like PC and no bridges over SR-201) they kept it on private property to avoid the public. I think they should present alternatives.
10) Despite their claims of being protectors of wildness and the environment, Snowbird has a track record of destroying wilderness (see Mineral Basin, and Snowbird in general).
11) There has been no request for water quality or environmental impact tests. This should be required in an area that provides water to thousands of people.
In general we rush to develop and I am afraid of loosing wildness so close to an urban center--something truly unique these days. I just moved here from California. There you have to drive at least 2 hours, but for most 5-6 hours, to get to anything close to the Wasatch. We take that for granted in Utah. Development threatens a lot of wildness in Utah, from the South to the North. As stewards it is our job to keep it in check, preserve it for our children, and best of all get outside and enjoy it while we still have it!